In two studies, CUBICIN demonstrated comparatively less resource utilization for patients with complicated skin infections1,2
* A prospective, open-label, single-center study of CUBICIN 4 mg/kg daily in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) compared with matched historical controls receiving vancomycin.
† Antibiotic-related length of stay was defined as the difference between the day antibiotics were started for cSSSI and the day of discontinuation.
‡ Cost data included institutional hospital charges (drug costs were obtained from the average wholesale prices in the 2006
Red Book).
Retrospective, single-center study comparing daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin in patients with MRSA cSSSI. Overall costs calculated based on overall charges incurred for treatment, including both drug expenditures and hospital charges.
CUBICIN treatment costs for MRSA bacteremia
Total cost data for CUBICIN vs vancomycin
- In a post hoc analysis of data from a phase 3 trial evaluating CUBICIN in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, relative costs of treatment were compared in the subset of patients with MRSA receiving either CUBICIN 6 mg/kg or vancomycin3*
* Patients in the prespecified MRSA subgroup of the comparator treatment arm were to receive vancomycin + 4 days of initial low dose gentamicin. The gentamicin costs were included in this analysis.
4
† Total costs included study drug acquisition, infusions, medications/procedures associated with drug-related adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring and treatment failures, and hospital beds. Drug costs were based on 2006
Red Book (CUBICIN $0.365/mg, vancomycin $7.00/g). Procedure and laboratory costs were based on typical community hospital costs. The hospital stay per diem costs were calculated assuming ICU, step-down, and ward bed charges of $1300, $800, and $550, respectively.
Download the Cost Data for CUBICIN
References: 1. Davis SL, McKinnon PS, Hall LM, et al. Daptomycin versus vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections: Clinical and economic outcomes.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1611-1618.
2. Fossaceca C. Retrospective review of clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes associated with daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid usage in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Poster presented at: 2007 Summer Meeting of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; June 24-27, 2007; San Francisco, CA. Poster P53E.
3. Bhavnani SM, Prakhya A, Hammel JP, Ambrose PG. Cost-effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and/or endocarditis. Poster presented at: 45th Annual Meeting of IDSA; October 4-7, 2007; San Diego, CA. Poster 1112.
4. Fowler VG Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, et al; the
S. aureus Endocarditis and Bacteremia Study Group. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by
Staphylococcus aureus.
N Engl J Med. 2006;355:653-665.